Align the board with climate goals
Enable good climate governance from the top down
Enable good climate governance from the top down
Companies are increasingly required to consider climate change as part of their corporate governance. To align directors’ duties with climate targets, consider whether to integrate climate considerations into core governance documentation by updating company policies and articles of association. Directors should be held accountable for reducing the company’s emissions and achieving other climate goals. This incentivises directors to align the business with Paris Agreement goals, especially if they risk personal liability for failing to comply.
[Subject to OR In accordance with] the articles of association, the directors are responsible for the management of [the Company]’s business, for which purpose they may exercise all the powers of [the Company].
The directors shall manage [the Company] in a manner that achieves all of the following:
promotes a just transition to a fair, equitable and low-carbon economy.
The directors shall do all of the following:
See Allocate responsibility for delivery of the transition plan section of our Deliver a climate transition plan guide. The members of this committee should be different to those on the remuneration committee.
Directors should be rewarded for achieving climate goals and emissions-reduction targets as well as being held accountable if they fail to do so. Remuneration policies and practices should be designed to support the company’s strategy and executive remuneration should be clearly linked to the successful delivery of the company’s long-term strategy.
Key principles of the remuneration policy for executive directors
The executive directors’ compensation package should promote the long-term, sustainable success of [the Company], with a focus on its environmental, social and governance (ESG) targets.
The ESG targets are set on an annual basis and are aligned with our externally communicated ambitions and commitments. Where performance is below the agreed ambition and commitments, the remuneration committee will use its discretion to assess vesting based on performance against the stated ambition and any other relevant information. The remuneration committee will determine the actual weighting of an award prior to grant.
The remuneration committee seeks guidance each year from the sustainability committee when assessing and reviewing performance ESG targets. The remuneration committee has taken a holistic view of [the Company]’s performance in critical areas, including any matters outside the targets which the sustainability committee considers relevant.
The [relevant incentive arrangement] is subject to the following performance conditions:
Financial performance condition
[●]
ESG performance condition
[●] percent of the [relevant incentive arrangement] is subject to [the Company] achieving the ESG Performance Condition.
The remuneration committee will assess the ESG performance condition based on [the Company] meeting the following criteria by [date]:
| Criteria | Weighting |
| Environmental targets | [●] percent |
| Social targets | [●] percent |
| Governance targets | [●] percent |
Environmental targets
Subject to shareholder approval of the proposed [year] policy, the targets for the [relevant incentive arrangement] will be reviewed annually by the committee and those agreed for [year] are:
[Include an analysis of [the Company]’s performance against each target and an analysis of trends or changes in the entity’s performance.]
Personal and strategic objectives for the [job title] in [year]
[Objectives could include: to ensure carbon data methodology and data collection process is robust enough to anchor our ESG roadmap; to address performance issues and capability requirements to drive forward our ESG agenda; to complete energy audits, together with action plans for achieving reductions by the end of [year].]
| Category | Objective(s) set | Met? | Commentary |
| ESG | [insert objectives relevant to the Company] | [the remuneration report should report on progress against these objectives] |
December 2025
This guide was updated following a quality assurance review.
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Updated:
Maintained
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Updated:
Maintained
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Updated:
Not maintained
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Updated:
Not maintained